City OK's blatant misuse of taxpayer money
The image above, of a partial 2005 Cincinnati Reds schedule, apparently doesn't advocate Chris Monzel despite the picture of him and the text "Councilmen Chris Monzel." The Cincinnati Elections Commission decided Thursday to let Monzel slide. This situation has been well documented at the sources available below.
The complaint
Kevin Osborne of the Post wrote this story yesterday before the hearing
Korte's take on the hearing
Dean's response to findings
The citizens of Cincinnati deserve better than this. No one other than Chris Monzel and his campaign team want to see Monzel's name on the Reds schedule. It clearly serves no purpose other than to increase Monzel's name/face recognition with an eye toward successfully holding his council seat in the upcoming election.
I heretofore declare that Mr. Monzel's first name is offically changed to "Red."
Red Monzel, and the rest of City Hall, now have confirmation that they can spend money platering their face on things for no good reason — as long as they act early!
Posted by
Someone |
10:19 PM
Mountain, meet Molehill.
Posted by
Anonymous |
10:25 PM
There is no basis for a complaint here. If there were, then council members could no longer send out correspondence, because it would be considered campaign material. In fact, using that argument, the complaint itself can be considered propoganda to help promote the Dean.
Posted by
Ron |
8:13 AM
Where did you find it? Interesting read refurbished cisco Clomid pcos pregnancy water and hiking shoes Ricoh printer and fax Phentermine+pill+slimming Skin+care+treatment 760 aid food kitchen processor San diego ca vacation van rentals 1976 dodge superior motor home Del dimensions 8300 hard drives Www buspirone com Seroquel for bipolar Womens hostel bangkok Texas mortgage umax ppc birkenstock clog and hiking boot acuvue two colored opaque single contact lens Free hardcore download Propecia haarwuchs
Posted by
Anonymous |
12:11 AM